Leadership
Most founders treat culture like a project. Pick some values, put them on a slide, maybe get them printed and hung in the break room. Then everyone goes back to work and the poster becomes wallpaper.
That’s not where culture actually gets built. Culture gets set in three rooms most people don’t think of as culture work at all: the hiring room, the firing room, and the performance review.
How you hire tells the team what you actually reward, not what you say you reward. Every hire either raises the bar or quietly lowers it, and people notice which one is happening far faster than leadership usually realizes.
How you fire tells the team what happens when someone doesn’t meet that bar. Handled with clarity and respect, it confirms the bar is real. Handled badly, or avoided entirely, it tells everyone the standard is theater.
How you handle performance, the recognition and the correction both, tells the team whether feedback here is honest or political. A team that trusts its feedback loop will tell you the truth. A team that doesn’t will tell you what you want to hear, right up until they leave.
Get any one of these three wrong and the values poster stops meaning anything. You can’t culture your way out of a bad hiring process or a leader who avoids hard conversations. Those three decisions are where culture actually lives. Everything else is decoration.
What this looked like in practice
I spent six years in operational leadership at a digital content agency, eventually running the team as COO during a period of real growth. Culture wasn’t a side project there. It was infrastructure: hiring standards that didn’t bend under deadline pressure, a feedback loop that worked in both directions, and a way of handling underperformance that didn’t require pretending it wasn’t happening.
That included catching my own misses, not just the team’s. At a company-wide Q1 meeting, I stood up and apologized to an employee, in front of everyone, for promoting them and never actually announcing it. The work had been done and the title had been earned, but the recognition never happened out loud. I got emotional saying so. Recognition isn’t just something you owe your team. It’s something you have to actively check yourself on, because the misses are easy to make and easy to let slide if nobody’s willing to say it out loud, including about their own mistakes.
That culture didn’t get graded by us. Agency Workplaces, an outside group that runs anonymous culture surveys for agencies, put a number on it: a 91/100 employee engagement score, inside a high-volume, deadline-driven content operation. That score came directly from the team’s own anonymous responses, not from anything leadership submitted or claimed, and the agency was included in their H1 2026 culture rankings on that basis.
That’s the part that matters. It’s easier to trust a number like that when the people grading it have nothing to gain by saying it.
The takeaway for founders
If your culture depends on you personally holding it together, it isn’t built yet. It’s borrowed time. The real test isn’t the offsite or the values deck. It’s whether your hiring bar holds when you’re busy, whether a hard conversation happens when it needs to instead of six months later, and whether feedback in your company runs both directions or just one.
Those three rooms are where the work actually is. Start there.
Bring the constraint that keeps reappearing. We’ll find out whether it’s a strategy issue, a systems issue, or a visibility issue.
Start a conversation